The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Announcing Our Academy Board of Directors Elected Members 2025–2026
Thank you to everyone who voted, we are so pleased to announce the newly elected members-at-large and president-elect who will join your Academy Board of…
Academy, ADA, and ASHA Announce the Introduction of MAAIA in the Senate
The American Academy of Audiology, Academy of Doctors of Audiology (ADA), and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) are pleased to announce the introduction of the Medicare…
Admission Rates of Neonatal Intensive Care Units in the United States
Pediatric audiology case-history questionnaires often ask about birth history and time spent in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). As such, audiologists who routinely see…