The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Allergies in U.S. Adults
Individuals who live in colder areas of the country may be eagerly awaiting the arrival of spring and its associated warmer weather. Others may be…
Securing Federal Loan Access for Audiology Students: Comments Close March 2
The Academy is pursuing a two-pronged strategy through Congress and the Department of Education to protect federal student loan access for AuD students. Both pathways…
Rock the PAC: An Evening of Music, Networking, and Advocacy
This content is an exclusive benefit for American Academy of Audiology members. If you’re a member, log in and you’ll get immediate access. Member Login…


