The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Tinnitus Severity Linked to Mood, Sleep, and Personality
Tinnitus affects approximately 10 percent of the U.S. adult population and 14 percent of the world’s population (NIDCD, 2025). Tinnitus can sound different to individuals,…
Academy Board of Directors Meets with Lawmakers During Government Shutdown
On October 23, the Academy Board of Directors held a successful Hill Day in Washington, D.C. amid the federal government shutdown. The Academy is deeply…
Influence of the Electrical Dynamic Range (EDR) on Speech Perception, Vocabulary, and Quality of Life in Young Children
A person’s electrical dynamic range (EDR) in a cochlear implant (CI) is defined as the difference between the highest tolerable current level, without discomfort or…


