The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
The Humpback Whale’s Range of Hearing Is Not What was Believed
Researchers from the University of Queensland, Australia, and the National Marine Mammal Foundation in San Diego, California, recently joined forces to determine the true range of…
Academy Calls for FY 2027 Investments in Hearing Health
As Congress develops the fiscal year (FY) 2027 Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations bill, the Academy is urging targeted investments to strengthen…
CMS Moves to All Electronic Filing for Claims Documentation
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced on March 20, 2026, the Administrative Simplification, Adoption of Standards for Health Care Claims Attachments Transactions…


