The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
New Survey for Children with Unilateral Hearing Loss
The prevalence of unilateral hearing loss (UHL) is estimated to be between 3–6 percent of school-aged children, and congenital UHL is approximately 1 per 1000…
Sleep Disorders and Hearing Loss
Everyone needs sleep. It is crucial for both physical and mental well-being, restoring, and rejuvenating the body and mind. However, the World Health Organization estimates…
Congress Passes One Big Beautiful Bill Act Amid Major Medicaid Overhaul
On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed the sweeping One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), marking the most significant federal health care funding overhaul in decades. The legislation…