The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) posted on October 25, 2023 Advisory Opinion No. 23-08, in which OIG rejected a proposed arrangement from a cochlear implant device manufacturer (the requestor) that would provide a free hearing aid to certain qualified patients who received a cochlear implant. OIG concluded the proposed arrangement could generate prohibited remuneration under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and the Beneficiary Inducement Law and could violate those laws if the requisite intent were present.
Under the proposed arrangement, the manufacturer would offer a bundle consisting of a cochlear implant made by the manufacturer and a free hearing aid manufactured by a third party. The cochlear implant would be purchased by a hospital or ambulatory surgical center (ASC), and for certain “bimodal hearing candidates,” a hearing aid would be provided for free to the patient along with the cochlear implant. OIG determined that the proposed arrangement implicated the AKS because the manufacturer would provide remuneration in the form of a free hearing aid that may induce patients and providers (e.g., ASCs) to purchase the manufacturer’s cochlear implant, which is reimbursable by FHCPs.
Recent Posts
Academy, ADA, and ASHA Announce the Introduction of MAAIA in the Senate
The American Academy of Audiology, Academy of Doctors of Audiology (ADA), and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) are pleased to announce the introduction of the Medicare…
Admission Rates of Neonatal Intensive Care Units in the United States
Pediatric audiology case-history questionnaires often ask about birth history and time spent in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). As such, audiologists who routinely see…
A New Flexible Auditory Brainstem Implant
An auditory brainstem implant (ABI) provides the sensation of sound to individuals who are deaf due to neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) or a severely compromised or…