Bill SB1458, sponsored by Arizona State Senator Nancy Barto (R), would waive licensure requirements for the Certificate of Clinical Competence in Audiology (CCC-A); recognize only American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) accredited educational programs; and add two speech-language pathology (SLP) assistants to the State Advisory Committee.
The Academy does NOT support the legislation as currently drafted. Reach out to your state representative and senator to express your concerns.
-
This legislation would add language to waive the components of audiology licensure for those applicants who hold “a Certificate of Clinical Competence in audiology from a nationally recognized speech language hearing association.” The Certificate of Clinical Competence in Audiology (CCC-A) is a voluntary certification program, wholly owned by a single association, the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA).
-
This legislation would replace existing language that requires “a doctoral degree in audiology from a nationally or regionally accredited college or university in an accredited program consistent with the standards of this state’s universities” with “a doctoral degree in audiology from an accredited program recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.” There is another organization that accredits audiology programs in the United States, the Accreditation Commission for Audiology Education (ACAE). At this time, the ACAE does not accredit any audiology programs in the state of Arizona; however, audiology programs should have the option of being able to select ACAE accreditation and graduating audiologists who would meet this eligibility criteria. ACAE accreditation is nationally recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). This language should not be changed; or it should include ACAE specifically or include only broader language that recognizes accredited programs recognized by the Department of Education (DOE) and CHEA.
-
This legislation seeks to add two SLP assistants to the Arizona Advisory Committee. The addition of two SLP assistants would provide disproportionate representation to the profession of speech-language pathology. In addition, SLP assistants are envisioned as working under the supervision of an Arizona state-licensed speech-language pathologist. Therefore, the representation of SLP assistants on the Advisory Committee can be adequately represented by the SLPs on the Committee.
Related Posts
Academy Opposes Tennessee Legislation to Add Cerumen Management to Hearing Instrument Specialist Scope of Practice
The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course. The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing…
Academy Weighs In Against Illinois Bill to License Audiology Assistants
The American Academy of Audiology has expressed its opposition to Illinois HB 3102 that would create a new licensure category for audiology assistants and would allow proof of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) certification as an audiology assistant as a pathway to such licensure. The American Academy of Audiology does not see a necessity for state licensing…
Academy Opposes Florida Legislation to Remove Audiological Evaluation Prior to Issuance of Hearing Aid
The American Academy of Audiology has expressed its opposition to Florida legislation that would remove the current state requirement that individuals receive evaluation and testing by a licensed audiologist and instead allow individuals simply to sign a waiver prior to receiving a hearing aid. This legislation was introduced and very quickly amended into SB 700—a large…
