The New York Department of Health recently proposed shifting to a two-tiered testing protocol in the New York Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs (UNHS) to “be consistent with nationally recognized standards established by the Joint Committee of Infant Hearing (JCIH).” The New York proposal would mandate utilizing an otoacoustic emissions (OAE) screening followed by an automated auditory brainstem response (AABR).
The JCIH 2019 position statement, Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) Programs, presents evidence and supports a two-stage protocol as proposed in the above-referenced NY amendment. However, the JCIH did not dictate which screening technologies should be used as first screening vs. second screening. JCIH (2019) only comments that the preferred method is to rescreen using automated auditory brainstem response if the initial screening was also completed via AABR. Otherwise, the recommendation of screening methodology is not dictated.
In addition, the proposed new screening protocol does not differentiate between the well-baby and the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) settings. The use of only AABR in the NICU setting is the continued recommendation of JCIH (2019). This recommendation is based on evidence for higher prevalence rates of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder in this population (Berg et al, 2005) which may be otherwise missed with the use of OAE technology as the chosen screening method.
Academy comments recommend reconsideration of mandating both types of screening in a specific order in the well baby population; a clear recommendation for AABR screening in the NICU population, and greater clarity regarding the number of screenings in the inpatient setting and policies for referral after a second failed screening as an inpatient.
Reference
Berg AL, Spitzer JB, Towers HM, Bartosiewicz C, Diamond BE. (2005) Newborn hearing screening in the NICU: Profile of failed auditory brainstem response/Passed otoacoustic emission. Pediatrics. 116(4):933–938. doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-2806.
Related Posts
Biden Administration Takes Action to Advance Responsible Artificial Intelligence, Research, Development, and Deployment
On May 23, the Biden Administration released FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Takes New Steps to Advance Responsible Artificial Intelligence Research, Development, and Deployment | The White House, outlining the myriad of actions taken to date to identify and manage the risks of artificial intelligence (AI) including a Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights |…
HHS-OIG Releases Toolkit for Assessing Telehealth Billing Risks
Released last week by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the Inspector General (OIG), a new federal toolkit aims to help health-care stakeholders analyze their telehealth claims data to assess program integrity risks. The toolkit is based on the methodology developed for a report published September 2022 that assessed providers who billed Medicare for…
States Develop Operational Plans to Address Medicaid “Unwinding” Process
At the start of the pandemic, Congress enacted the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), which included a provision that state Medicaid programs keep people continuously enrolled through the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE), in exchange for enhanced federal funding. At the end of 2022, legislation was signed into law ending continuous…