The current FTC Guides state that “endorsers qualifications must in fact give the endorser the expertise that the endorser is represented as possessing with respect to the endorsement.” The proposed modification of an illustrative example in the Guides implies that an endorser of a hearing aid should not be referred to as “Doctor” as this implies that the endorser is a medical doctor. The text goes on to note that “a non-medical doctor” (e.g., an individual with a Ph.D. in audiology) might be able to endorse the product if the advertisement discloses the nature and limits of the endorser’s experience.
The Academy comments highlight current educational training and scope of practice for audiology in all 50 states and references the 2022 Academy Position Statement that supports the use of the title “doctor” for members who have earned doctoral degrees from accredited institutions, with the provision that the audiologist provide clarification as to which field they hold their doctorate. The Academy letter requests that this illustrative example be amended to reflect this clarification.
Recent Posts
Protect Audiology Licensure in Utah
The Utah Office of Professional Licensure Review (OPLR) has recommended a drastic change that would eliminate professional licensure for audiologists and speech-language pathologists and replace…
Government Re-Opening: What It Means for Hearing Health
After weeks of uncertainty, Congress has reached an agreement and is expected to vote later today on a continuing resolution to reopen the federal government…
Submit Your Poster Now
Join us in curating an annual convention program that amplifies the value of the profession. The AAA 2026 Program Committee is proud to invite clinicians,…


