The current FTC Guides state that “endorsers qualifications must in fact give the endorser the expertise that the endorser is represented as possessing with respect to the endorsement.” The proposed modification of an illustrative example in the Guides implies that an endorser of a hearing aid should not be referred to as “Doctor” as this implies that the endorser is a medical doctor. The text goes on to note that “a non-medical doctor” (e.g., an individual with a Ph.D. in audiology) might be able to endorse the product if the advertisement discloses the nature and limits of the endorser’s experience.
The Academy comments highlight current educational training and scope of practice for audiology in all 50 states and references the 2022 Academy Position Statement that supports the use of the title “doctor” for members who have earned doctoral degrees from accredited institutions, with the provision that the audiologist provide clarification as to which field they hold their doctorate. The Academy letter requests that this illustrative example be amended to reflect this clarification.
Recent Posts
Congress Introduces Legislation to Protect Audiology Students’ Access to Federal Loans
New bipartisan legislation (H.R. 6718) introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives would restore audiology to the federal definition of a professional degree under the…
Academy Presents Inaugural AAA National Health Leadership Award to Representative Bilirakis
Today, Patrick Gallagher, Executive Director of the American Academy of Audiology, presented the inaugural AAA National Hearing Health Leadership Award to Representative Gus Bilirakis (R-FL)…
2026 Academy Honors and Awards Recipients
Every year, the Academy asks colleagues, friends, and mentees to look around their professional circles and identify members who are deserving of recognition for outstanding…


