The current FTC Guides state that “endorsers qualifications must in fact give the endorser the expertise that the endorser is represented as possessing with respect to the endorsement.” The proposed modification of an illustrative example in the Guides implies that an endorser of a hearing aid should not be referred to as “Doctor” as this implies that the endorser is a medical doctor. The text goes on to note that “a non-medical doctor” (e.g., an individual with a Ph.D. in audiology) might be able to endorse the product if the advertisement discloses the nature and limits of the endorser’s experience.
The Academy comments highlight current educational training and scope of practice for audiology in all 50 states and references the 2022 Academy Position Statement that supports the use of the title “doctor” for members who have earned doctoral degrees from accredited institutions, with the provision that the audiologist provide clarification as to which field they hold their doctorate. The Academy letter requests that this illustrative example be amended to reflect this clarification.
Recent Posts
Why Do Elephants Have Such Big Ears?
African elephants have the largest ears of any animal, sometimes growing more than six feet long and five feet wide. An elephant’s ears are used…
Founders’ Day
The 32 audiologists gathered in Houston, Texas, in 1988 to discuss the formation of a national association of audiologists. On January 30, 1988, 32 audiologists met…
House Minibus Advances with Mixed Outcomes for EHDI
Last week, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a fiscal year (FY) 2026 minibus appropriations package that includes the Labor, Health and Human Services, and…


