The current FTC Guides state that “endorsers qualifications must in fact give the endorser the expertise that the endorser is represented as possessing with respect to the endorsement.” The proposed modification of an illustrative example in the Guides implies that an endorser of a hearing aid should not be referred to as “Doctor” as this implies that the endorser is a medical doctor. The text goes on to note that “a non-medical doctor” (e.g., an individual with a Ph.D. in audiology) might be able to endorse the product if the advertisement discloses the nature and limits of the endorser’s experience.
The Academy comments highlight current educational training and scope of practice for audiology in all 50 states and references the 2022 Academy Position Statement that supports the use of the title “doctor” for members who have earned doctoral degrees from accredited institutions, with the provision that the audiologist provide clarification as to which field they hold their doctorate. The Academy letter requests that this illustrative example be amended to reflect this clarification.
Recent Posts
ABA Certification Update
As audiology continues to grow and expand, more audiologists are becoming specialty providers, focusing their scope of practice and increasing their skill set to better…
Introducing the New Certificate Holder-Educational Audiology (CH-EdAud) Program
Three years ago, I made the best decision of my career. After more than thirty years as a clinical audiologist serving adult and geriatric patients,…
Hydrops Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accurately Differentiates Meniere’s Disease, Vestibular Migraine
In a prospective study conducted by Bernaerts and colleagues (2025), 15 patients with Meniere’s disease and 16 with vestibular migraine received inner ear magnetic resonance…