The current FTC Guides state that “endorsers qualifications must in fact give the endorser the expertise that the endorser is represented as possessing with respect to the endorsement.” The proposed modification of an illustrative example in the Guides implies that an endorser of a hearing aid should not be referred to as “Doctor” as this implies that the endorser is a medical doctor. The text goes on to note that “a non-medical doctor” (e.g., an individual with a Ph.D. in audiology) might be able to endorse the product if the advertisement discloses the nature and limits of the endorser’s experience.
The Academy comments highlight current educational training and scope of practice for audiology in all 50 states and references the 2022 Academy Position Statement that supports the use of the title “doctor” for members who have earned doctoral degrees from accredited institutions, with the provision that the audiologist provide clarification as to which field they hold their doctorate. The Academy letter requests that this illustrative example be amended to reflect this clarification.
Recent Posts
Securing Federal Loan Access for Audiology Students: Comments Close March 2
The Academy is pursuing a two-pronged strategy through Congress and the Department of Education to protect federal student loan access for AuD students. Both pathways…
Rock the PAC: An Evening of Music, Networking, and Advocacy
This content is an exclusive benefit for American Academy of Audiology members. If you’re a member, log in and you’ll get immediate access. Member Login…
Amplifying Audiology’s Voice: Advocacy Ambassador Program
The Academy is launching the Advocacy Ambassador Program, a grassroots advocacy program to strengthen audiology’s voice nationwide. The program will debut at the AAA Annual…


