The current FTC Guides state that “endorsers qualifications must in fact give the endorser the expertise that the endorser is represented as possessing with respect to the endorsement.” The proposed modification of an illustrative example in the Guides implies that an endorser of a hearing aid should not be referred to as “Doctor” as this implies that the endorser is a medical doctor. The text goes on to note that “a non-medical doctor” (e.g., an individual with a Ph.D. in audiology) might be able to endorse the product if the advertisement discloses the nature and limits of the endorser’s experience.
The Academy comments highlight current educational training and scope of practice for audiology in all 50 states and references the 2022 Academy Position Statement that supports the use of the title “doctor” for members who have earned doctoral degrees from accredited institutions, with the provision that the audiologist provide clarification as to which field they hold their doctorate. The Academy letter requests that this illustrative example be amended to reflect this clarification.
Recent Posts
Some Fish Hear with Their Bones and Communicate in an Unusual Way
We love to scratch the ears of our pets, and when we think of animal ears, we think of fur-covered appendages that are small, large,…
Advancing Audiology: SPAN Wraps Up 2025 with Key Updates on CPT Codes
The State Policy Advocate Network (SPAN) held its final meeting of the year last week, closing out the fourth quarter with a focus on critical…
Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology Interstate Compact Update
The Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology Interstate Compact (ASLP-IC) Commission recently announced that the CompactConnect data system has officially launched! CompactConnect is the data system that…


