The current FTC Guides state that “endorsers qualifications must in fact give the endorser the expertise that the endorser is represented as possessing with respect to the endorsement.” The proposed modification of an illustrative example in the Guides implies that an endorser of a hearing aid should not be referred to as “Doctor” as this implies that the endorser is a medical doctor. The text goes on to note that “a non-medical doctor” (e.g., an individual with a Ph.D. in audiology) might be able to endorse the product if the advertisement discloses the nature and limits of the endorser’s experience.
The Academy comments highlight current educational training and scope of practice for audiology in all 50 states and references the 2022 Academy Position Statement that supports the use of the title “doctor” for members who have earned doctoral degrees from accredited institutions, with the provision that the audiologist provide clarification as to which field they hold their doctorate. The Academy letter requests that this illustrative example be amended to reflect this clarification.
Recent Posts
Celebrating Community and Giving Back in The Big Easy
The AAA Foundation had a fantastic showing at AAA 2025+HearTECH Expo in New Orleans! With incredible supporters, generous sponsors, and fun-filled events, it was a…
Contact Your Representative: Support the Medicare Audiology Legislation
The Medicare Audiology Access Improvement Act (H.R. 2757) was reintroduced in the U.S. House—and we need your help to gain critical momentum. This bipartisan bill…
Academy Fights Hearing Aid Specialists Scope Expansion in Nevada
The Academy submitted a letter to the Nevada legislature expressing strong opposition to Assembly Bill 177. The bill proposes expanding the scope of practice for…