Early identification and intervention have repeatedly demonstrated better outcomes for children who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing in many areas, including language and reading. Research supports the idea that, for children who receive cochlear implants (CI), better language performance after implantation is often associated with socioeconomic factors, specifically, parents’ education level and income (Cejas et al, 2021, Sharma et al, 2017). Specifically, the higher the parent’s education level and family income, the better speech and language performance after cochlear implantation (Sharma et al, 2017).
Recently, researchers from the Republic of Korea completed a study with a unique twist on this idea. They retrospectively studied 109 children who received CI and had support from the Cochlear Implant Donation Program (CIDP), which funds all expenses related to the CI (exams, outpatient visits, hospitalization, surgery, four-year language rehab program through a third party). Essentially, the financial barrier for these families was removed.
Data collected and analyzed included age at implantation, sex, family monthly household income, parental education level, dual or single parent family, and rural or urban residence.
Results revealed that monthly household income, previously identified as a prognostic factor, had no significant effect on speech and language development after CI surgery. Even more importantly, results revealed the importance of familial factors even when language rehabilitation was provided at no cost to the family. Language development after CI surgery was better if there was a two-parent household and a higher parental education level. Finally, the study also demonstrated that the higher the mother’s education level, the younger the child at the time of the first CI surgery.
References
Cejas, I., Mitchell, C.M., Barker, D.H., Sarangoulis, C., Eisenberg, L., Quittner, A. (2021). Parenting stress, self-efficacy, and involvement: effects on spoken language ability three years after cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 42(10S), S11-S18.
Lee, C., Son, S. E., Moon, I. J., Chung, W. H., Cho, Y. S., Hong, S. H., & Cho, Y. S. (2025). The role of socioeconomic factors and third-party support in language development for children with cochlear implants. Scientific reports, 15(1), 8750.
Sharma S., Bhatia, K., Singh, S., Lahiri, A.K., Aggarwal, A. (2017). Impact of socioeconomic factors on paediatric cochlear implant outcomes. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 102, 90-97.
Recent Posts
Dizziness and Neck Pain: A Perspective on Cervicogenic Dizziness
Cervicogenic dizziness is a somewhat controversial topic, as this condition is often considered a diagnosis of exclusion without a specific objective standardized test across health-care…
Audiologists Advocate for Fair Use of “Doctor” Title in Florida
This week, the American Academy of Audiology, in collaboration with the Florida Academy of Audiology (FLAA), voiced concerns about House Bill (HB) 1341—legislation that would…
Arkansas Enacts Law Expanding Audiologists’ Scope of Practice
Arkansas Senate Bill 118 has been signed into law, updating the state’s audiology scope of practice statute. The law allows audiologists who are licensed to…