The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Update on Hearing Device Services Codes
As released publicly in the March 10, 2026, AMA’s Errata & Technical Corrections CPT 2026, the parentheticals related to code 92628 (Evaluation for hearing candidacy)…
Intratympanic Steroid Therapy as a Salvage Treatment for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Fernandez et al. (2026) completed a retrospective analysis of 86 patients seen between 2019 and 2024 with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). This analysis compared…
Clinical Superiority of Belly-Tendon Montage Over Others for Recording Air-Conducted Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential
In a recent study published by Raveendran and Singh (2026), a number of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) electrode montages were compared. This study…


