The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Turn Insight Into Action! Attend Learning Labs at AAA 2026
Ready to take your professional development to the next level? At AAA 2026, Learning Labs are your chance to go beyond lectures and dive into…
Your Support Makes the Difference—Let’s Finish the Year Strong
As we wrap up the year, I want to thank you for your generosity supporting the AAA Foundation’s work. The enclosed report highlights what you…
Audiology Faces New Challenges Under Draft Federal Loan Rule: What Comes Next
Member Action Needed Soon! The U.S. Department of Education’s Advisory Committee has reached consensus on proposed regulations implementing the higher education provisions of the One…


