The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Industrial Air Pollution and Newborn Hearing Screening Failure
The connection between air pollution and hearing loss has been established for over a decade, with most research focusing on adults. Studies have also shown that…
EHDI Program Eliminated
On April 1, President Trump’s administration eliminated the entire branch of the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) program that works with states to analyze…
Speak Up Today: Modernize Medicare Payment Policy
Congress is preparing to take action on a budget reconciliation package the week of May 5, and now is a critical time for the audiology…