The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Americans Do Not Understand the Importance of Hearing Health
A new report finds that most Americans are not aware of the impact hearing health can have on their overall health. Listen To This is a…
Medicaid Work Requirements Rule Could Affect Access to Hearing Healthcare
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently issued an Interim Final Rule implementing Medicaid work requirements for certain adult beneficiaries beginning in 2027….
Sleep in U.S. Adults
Previously, we reported on sleep routines and tiredness in children. You may now be wondering how well adults sleep. If so, a recent report by…


