The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Can You (Or Should You) Bring a Baby to a Concert?
Have you ever seen a baby or a young child at a very noisy event? Chances are you have. And often, these infants and young…
SPAN Members Connect on Student Loan Advocacy and State Legislative Updates
The American Academy of Audiology’s State Policy Advocate Network (SPAN) held its third quarterly meeting on July 22, bringing together Academy members from across the…
Illinois Governor Signs Hearing Care Plan Transparency
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker signed into law Senate Bill 2838 (SB 2838), a measure designed to increase transparency, strengthen consumer protections, and improve fairness in…



