The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Academy Joins National Push for Inclusive Loan Rules for Health Professions
Late last month, the Academy signed onto a letter to the Department of Education and the Reimagining and Improving Student Education (RISE) rulemaking committee urging…
Discover the Art of Human Care with Dr. Hassan A. Tetteh
Be sure to grab a front row seat at the AAA 2026 Opening General Session on Thursday, April 23, from 9:45–11:30 am, featuring Dr. Hassan A. Tetteh—surgeon,…
Protect Audiology Licensure in Utah
The Utah Office of Professional Licensure Review (OPLR) has recommended a drastic change that would eliminate professional licensure for audiologists and speech-language pathologists and replace…


