The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
NASEM Releases Report on Meaningful Outcomes in Adult Hearing Health Care
The National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine recently released the report “Measuring Meaningful Outcomes for Adult Hearing Health Outcomes.” The report includes the committee’s…
Trump Administration’s FY 2026 Budget Proposes Deep Cuts and Reorganization for HHS
President Donald Trump has released his fiscal year (FY) 2026 budget proposal for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). It reflects a dramatic…
Academy and FLAA Advocate Against Risky Hearing Aid Policies
Last week, Florida Senate Bill (SB) 126 passed in the Senate and moved to the House. Initially introduced alongside House Bill (HB) 101 to remove…