The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Audiology CPT® Codes Enter Routine AMA RUC Review Process
Over the next several months, a significant number of CPT® codes used to report audiology function tests will undergo review through the AMA/Specialty Society Relative…
Academy Advocacy on Capitol Hill for Student Loan Reform and EHDI Support
Last week, Joanne Zurcher, MPP, and Academy member Melissa Heche, AuD, traveled to Capitol Hill to advocate for two important Academy priorities: protecting access to…
A New Era in Hearing Care: FDA Approves OTOF Gene Therapy
In the United States, mutations in the OTOF-gene (otoferlin gene) account for between one percent and eight percent of non-syndromic congenital hearing loss (Ford et…


