The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Virginia Board Advances Rulemaking to Restore ABA Certification Pathway
Last year, the Virginia Board of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology finalized regulatory changes intended to streamline licensure by removing the direct linkage between certification and…
Sleep Routines and Tiredness in US Children
Do you work or interact with children? Do you any of them complain of being tired? If so, you may be interested in a recently-published…
AAA Foundation Highlights from AAA 2026
The AAA Foundation made a strong impact at AAA 2026 in San Antonio, supporting key sessions and events that advanced learning, collaboration, and community across…


