The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
EHDI Program Eliminated
On April 1, President Trump’s administration eliminated the entire branch of the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) program that works with states to analyze…
Speak Up Today: Modernize Medicare Payment Policy
Congress is preparing to take action on a budget reconciliation package the week of May 5, and now is a critical time for the audiology…
Volunteers Sought for Scholarship Review Task Force
Ready to make a meaningful impact? Join us as a volunteer for the 2025 Scholarship Review Task Force and help shape the future of tomorrow’s…