The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Academy Submits Comments on MPFS Proposed Rule CY 2027
On behalf of the membership, the American Academy of Audiology has submitted comments on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Calendar Year (CY)…
Where do U.S. Adults Obtain Their Usual Healthcare?
While we know that primary care providers can be a source of referrals for audiologic care, have you wondered how many individuals have a regular…
Use of Dietary Supplements in the United States
Audiologists, as part of their clinical practice, may review and/or solicit information regarding their patient’s medications. While a given patient may take prescription medications, some…



