The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Q4 SPAN Meeting to Focus on the ASLP-IC Compact
The American Academy of Audiology’s State Policy Advocate Network (SPAN) will hold its fourth-quarter meeting on October 28, 2026, from 8:00–9:00 pm ET. The meeting…
Tympanostomy Tubes Found in the Middle Ear Space: A Case Report
The placement of pressure equalization (PE) tubes is common procedure and often used for management of otitis media with effusion (OME), recurrent acute otitis media…
Cochlear Implant SatisfactionÂ
Approximately 118,000 adults and 65,000 children in the United States have cochlear implants (CI) (National Institutes of Health, 2021). Most CIs require an external processor,…



