The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
The Hum
In the early 1970s, humans around the globe began reporting a persistent, low frequency (30-80 Hz) noise and dubbed it “The Hum”. While there are…
Exploring the Impact of Tinnitus on Work Productivity
Over 50 million people in the United States experience tinnitus; nearly half of those individuals struggle with it, and some even perceive it as debilitating (American Tinnitus…
Federal Judge Blocks Key Portion of Student Loan Rule: Department Includes Professional Degree Status for Audiology Programs
Audiology students received an important, though temporary, victory after a federal court blocked a key provision of the U.S. Department of Education’s new student loan…



