The Academy expressed its opposition to Tennessee legislation (SB 665/ HB 920) that would add cerumen management to the scope of practice for hearing instrument specialists who have completed an International Hearing Society cerumen management course.
The Academy’s letter pointed out the critical differences between the education and training of an audiologist and a hearing instrument specialist and that cerumen management requires specialized training and experience that cannot be obtained through a short-term workshop as proposed by this legislation. For these reasons, the Academy’s letter advised that this scope of practice expansion for hearing instrument specialists would not be in the best interests of Tennessee consumers.
Recent Posts
Aerobic Physical Activity in U.S. Adults: An Updated Report
In 2022, the American Academy of Audiology shared an update regarding two data briefs about physical activity in the United States. One was related to…
Adding Vestibular Training to Post-Stroke Care
A recent study by Mishra and colleagues (2026) examined individuals with chronic post-stroke disequilibrium. Participants (n=18) received either traditional balance therapy or balance therapy plus…
No Surprises Act Reform: One to Watch in the Lame-Duck Session
As Congress prepares for the lame-duck session following the November midterm elections, health care legislation could be among the issues lawmakers seek to address before…



