The current FTC Guides state that “endorsers qualifications must in fact give the endorser the expertise that the endorser is represented as possessing with respect to the endorsement.” The proposed modification of an illustrative example in the Guides implies that an endorser of a hearing aid should not be referred to as “Doctor” as this implies that the endorser is a medical doctor. The text goes on to note that “a non-medical doctor” (e.g., an individual with a Ph.D. in audiology) might be able to endorse the product if the advertisement discloses the nature and limits of the endorser’s experience.
The Academy comments highlight current educational training and scope of practice for audiology in all 50 states and references the 2022 Academy Position Statement that supports the use of the title “doctor” for members who have earned doctoral degrees from accredited institutions, with the provision that the audiologist provide clarification as to which field they hold their doctorate. The Academy letter requests that this illustrative example be amended to reflect this clarification.
Related Posts
MAAIA Supporters Push for Congressional Action
The Academy, the Academy of Doctors of Audiology (ADA) and the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) facilitated a sign-on letter that went to House and Senate…
Legislation Introduced to Address Cuts in Medicare Physician Fee Schedule
On October 29, Congressman Gregory Murphy (R-NC), along with Representatives Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA), Ami Bera (D-CA), Larry Buchson (R-IN), Raul Ruiz (D-CA),…
AI and Algorithms Behind Surge in Medicare Advantage Care Denials
In spring 2023, the Senate Homeland Security Committee’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) launched an inquiry into barriers Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees face in accessing…