The current FTC Guides state that “endorsers qualifications must in fact give the endorser the expertise that the endorser is represented as possessing with respect to the endorsement.” The proposed modification of an illustrative example in the Guides implies that an endorser of a hearing aid should not be referred to as “Doctor” as this implies that the endorser is a medical doctor. The text goes on to note that “a non-medical doctor” (e.g., an individual with a Ph.D. in audiology) might be able to endorse the product if the advertisement discloses the nature and limits of the endorser’s experience.
The Academy comments highlight current educational training and scope of practice for audiology in all 50 states and references the 2022 Academy Position Statement that supports the use of the title “doctor” for members who have earned doctoral degrees from accredited institutions, with the provision that the audiologist provide clarification as to which field they hold their doctorate. The Academy letter requests that this illustrative example be amended to reflect this clarification.
Recent Posts
How Do Animals Perceive Music?
Music can be defined as vocal, instrumental, or mechanical sounds, with rhythm, melody or harmony, and often, an expression of human emotion. Music can transcend…
‘Eye’ on Health: AI Detects Dizziness and Balance Disorders Remotely
Interesting research led by audiologist Ali Danesh, PhD, at Florida Atlantic University (FAU) helped develop a novel, proof-of-concept tool to help identify nystagmus using a…
Rizatriptan vs. Placebo for Attacks of Vestibular Migraine: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Jeffrey Staab, MD, and colleagues studied the effectiveness of rizatriptan as a treatment option for vestibular migraine. Their research included 134 patients between the ages of…