Misophonia is an affective sound-processing disorder characterized by the experience of a strong negative emotional response to specific sounds, most commonly those generated when eating, drinking, and breathing; these sounds are often labeled “trigger” sounds.
The literature on misophonia has in general been limited to case studies and examination of characteristics in clinical populations, with a limited assessment of underlying physiological mechanisms contributing to the experience (Spankovich and Hall, 2014). Recently, a group out of Newcastle University in the United Kingdom, led by Sukhbinder Kumar performed functional imaging in participants with misophonia compared to matched controls.
During the imaging, participants listened to sounds rated neutral, unpleasant (but not triggers), and trigger sounds previously identified in an earlier portion of the study. Analysis of the imaging revealed significant activation of the anterior insular cortex (AIC) in response to triggering sounds compared to controls, this activation did not occur with unpleasant or neutral sounds. The AIC is involved in subjective feelings associated with emotion and a key region for detection, attention, and salience. Further, greater functional connectivity was observed in brain regions including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), posteromedial cortex (PMC), and limbic area. Structural maps showed evidence of greater myelination in the gray matter of the vmPFC, supporting altered functional connectivity in persons with misophonia. Finally, physiological responses (galvanic skin response and heart rate) were correlated with activity in the AIC, which may explain anxiety or anger experienced with trigger sounds.
Overall, these new findings demonstrate a physiological basis underlying misophonia. However, these data do not differentiate the physiological and connectivity changes as a cause or a consequence of misophonia. Also, the study does not detail any overt structural abnormalities in individuals with misophonia. The question remains to what underlies this enhanced connectivity? Is this simply physiological evidence of a conditioned response? Is there some unknown pre-existing susceptibility factor to forming this connectivity (perhaps hormonal or genetic)? Can we see changes in activity after potential therapies? Hopefully, these findings will encourage support for a further study to answer these questions.
Kumar et al. (2017) The brain basis for misophonia, Current Biology. Online pre-publication.
Spankovich C, Hall JW. (2014) The misunderstood misophonia. Audiology Today 26(4):15–23.
Most research data are conveyed visually through graphs, tables, or images. However, in recent years, converting visual data into auditory data has emerged as a unique adjunctive means to convey information. This process is called sonification and can increase access to information to those with visual impairments. The most visible use of this process has…
That’s right, a recent study completed by researchers in Canada and Germany demonstrated that people dance nearly 12 percent more when music includes very low-frequency (VLF) bass, but it may be the sounds we don’t hear that gets our toes tapping. Cameron and colleagues (2022) studied the attendees of a concert performed by electrical music…
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Academy of Audiology (2020) provided audiologists with guidance regarding the use of telehealth services. In October 2021, the Academy released a position statement titled The Use of Telehealth for the Delivery of Audiological Services. Members can access this statement here. While the COVID-19 pandemic may have expanded telehealth services,…