The current FTC Guides state that “endorsers qualifications must in fact give the endorser the expertise that the endorser is represented as possessing with respect to the endorsement.” The proposed modification of an illustrative example in the Guides implies that an endorser of a hearing aid should not be referred to as “Doctor” as this implies that the endorser is a medical doctor. The text goes on to note that “a non-medical doctor” (e.g., an individual with a Ph.D. in audiology) might be able to endorse the product if the advertisement discloses the nature and limits of the endorser’s experience.
The Academy comments highlight current educational training and scope of practice for audiology in all 50 states and references the 2022 Academy Position Statement that supports the use of the title “doctor” for members who have earned doctoral degrees from accredited institutions, with the provision that the audiologist provide clarification as to which field they hold their doctorate. The Academy letter requests that this illustrative example be amended to reflect this clarification.
Recent Posts
Arkansas Rules to Implement Audiology Scope Expansion
The Arkansas Board of Examiners in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology has finalized rules to implement Act 517 of 2025, which expanded the statutory scope of…
Can You (Or Should You) Bring a Baby to a Concert?
Have you ever seen a baby or a young child at a very noisy event? Chances are you have. And often, these infants and young…
SPAN Members Connect on Student Loan Advocacy and State Legislative Updates
The American Academy of Audiology’s State Policy Advocate Network (SPAN) held its third quarterly meeting on July 22, bringing together Academy members from across the…



